xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Scott Damron <sdamron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe it would be, I really am just trying to avoid using iSCSI
due to overhead. I also am struggling to understand XCP a bit I
guess. Is it really just Xen with VSwitch, Vastsky and a few other
magic bits thrown in, or is it entirely something new that tools you
would normally use with Xen won't work with? Does it use Vastsky and
VSwitch by default when you set up some systems, or do you have to
configure something special to make use of the switching and storage?
Thanks,
Scott
NFS has much more overhead than iSCSI. It also runs on TCP/IP (which is why iSCSI has so much overhead), but you have an NFS server and "forgeign" file system as well.
Best would be to use AOE (if you can't change to Fibre Optic) and then use something like ZFS / EXT4 on the Hypervisors -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Mike McClurg
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Joseph Glanville
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Igor Serebryany
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Martins Lazdans
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Wouter van Eekelen
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Wouter van Eekelen
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Joseph Glanville
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster,
Rudi Ahlers <=
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, shreyas pandya
|
|
|