xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:56:28PM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
> I would really recommend against using Gluster or any filesystem based
> method of providing VM storage
Ditto. I would specifically recommend against Gluster. We tried it at my
company for VM storage, and it's just not suitable for large files like
VM images, especially if you are hoping to use the advanced features
like replication.
--Igor
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Mike McClurg
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Joseph Glanville
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster,
Igor Serebryany <=
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Martins Lazdans
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Wouter van Eekelen
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Wouter van Eekelen
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Joseph Glanville
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Rudi Ahlers
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Scott Damron
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster, shreyas pandya
|
|
|