WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Gluster

Well, our setup is as follows:
- Hostnodes have a 8 GB USB stick or 30 GB SSD for local storage
- Are connected to a SAN through iSCSI.

You indeed need some local storage, but you can have the actual VM storage on a SAN.

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Scott Damron <sdamron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you actually thinking of XCP here when you say don't have any
disks in the servers?  I don't think that is an option, as it uses
local disk when bringing up a VM, I believe this is the default
behavior.  Then there is his question about Infiniband.  ipoib may be
supported in XCP, but plain Infiniband is not.  I imagine a person
could fiddle around and get it working, but it wouldn't be stable
enough from what I have seen.

Thanks,

Scott

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Wouter van Eekelen <me@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> You should have a SAN and have no disks in the actual servers.
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Martins Lazdans <marrtins@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What do you recommend for such configuration:
>> Say, we have 4 servers, each with 12 drives. I want to distribute and
>> replicate xen images over all servers in such manner that:
>> *) live migration works
>> *) *any* one of 4 server may fail still leaving *all* images accessible.
>> *) Will work over Infiniband (not only using ipoib)
>> *) It would be a big plus, if filesystem do not require separate
>> metadata/transaction/management/you-name-it server or at least provide
>> machanism for transparent fileover.
>>
>> I was reading deocumentation of number of network filesystems and
>> GlusterFS seemed the best choice.
>>
>> Igor Serebryany wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:56:28PM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would really recommend against using Gluster or any filesystem based
>>>> method of providing VM storage
>>>
>>> Ditto. I would specifically recommend against Gluster. We tried it at my
>>> company for VM storage, and it's just not suitable for large files like
>>> VM images, especially if you are hoping to use the advanced features
>>> like replication.
>>>
>>> --Igor
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>
>> --
>> Martins Lazdans
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>