xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
To: |
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report |
From: |
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:31:00 +0800 |
Accept-language: |
zh-CN, en-US |
Acceptlanguage: |
zh-CN, en-US |
Cc: |
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:31:33 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE7125563789BD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<A24AE1FFE7AEC5489F83450EE98351BF2BF2EC4CB0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE712556378690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE7125563789BD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
Acu6GEBstpnTfIH/TdeQZvf0FjUZ0QAOlF+wAI5FPEAAJDXLMAABNBkQ |
Thread-topic: |
Xen 4.1 rc1 test report |
Wei, Gang wrote on 2011-01-26:
> Just found sometime while doing domain_destroy the current->domain is
> IDLE domain, so the if ( !IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) ) hit and
> skip the pirq forcible unbinding. How could it happen?
Look like it is caused by call_rcu(&d->rcu, complete_domain_destroy) in the end
of domain_destroy fn. We may need to move the check for
IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) out and check it earlier in the call path if
necessary.
Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Zheng, Shaohui
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Zheng, Shaohui
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Zheng, Shaohui
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Stefano Stabellini
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Zheng, Shaohui
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report,
Wei, Gang <=
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Keir Fraser
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix bug1706, Wei, Gang
|
|
|