| 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
 
| 
To:  | 
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>,	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report | 
 
| 
From:  | 
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:49:36 +0800 | 
 
| 
Accept-language:  | 
zh-CN, en-US | 
 
| 
Acceptlanguage:  | 
zh-CN, en-US | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:50:26 -0800 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<C9648AEF.1265C%keir@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE712556378690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<C9648AEF.1265C%keir@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
Acu6GEBstpnTfIH/TdeQZvf0FjUZ0QAOlF+wAI5FPEAAA5TuuAADU3Rg | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report | 
 
 
 
Keir Fraser wrote on 2011-01-25:
> On 25/01/2011 14:05, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 3. Think about how we could prevent such cases from panic Xen.
>> 
>> Any ideas, hints, comments, suggestions or even fixes on it?
> 
> Either the domain destroy path should forcibly unbind pirqs, or a
> non-empty set of pirq bindings should hold at least one reference to a
> domain, to prevent it being destroyed+freed.
> 
> Is forcible unbinding ever dangerous to system stability? If not
> perhaps that is best.
I agree, and will have a try in this way.
Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
| 
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Keir Fraser
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix bug1706, Wei, Gang
 |  
  
 | 
    |