WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report

To: "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
From: "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:54:48 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:56:56 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A24AE1FFE7AEC5489F83450EE98351BF2BF2EC4CB0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101241852090.7277@kaball-desktop> <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F2231C135DB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101251559210.7277@kaball-desktop>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acu8qQPTbCIuYlTvRZCuW8poc+DBMgASysDgAAYXkwA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
Stefano,
        We tried changeset 22812: 73b3debb90cf, this bug was already fixed. We 
can success to assign two and two more devices to guest now. Thanks.

Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zheng, Shaohui
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 9:02 AM
> To: 'Stefano Stabellini'; Zhang, Yang Z
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
> 
> Stefano,
>       It is static passthrou via the hvm configure file, for dynamic 
> pci-attach, there is not such bug. QA
> already identify that it is a regression between CS 22653 and 22764.
> 
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Shaohui
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:01 AM
> > To: Zhang, Yang Z
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Zheng, Shaohui; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> > > > > 5. [vt-d] fail to passthrou two or more devices to guest (Community)
> > > > > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1710
> > > >
> > > > Assigning multiple devices to an HVM guest using qemu should work,
> > > > however assigning multiple devices to a PV guest or an HVM
> > > > guest using stubdoms is known NOT to work. In particular this is what
> > > > IanC is working on.
> > > >
> > > > Is this bug being reproduced using stubdoms? If so, this is a known
> > > > issue, otherwise it might be a new bug.
> > >
> > > No, we don't use stubdoms. This also is a regression. Changeset 22653 
> > > didn't have this problem.
> >
> > Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this bug either.
> > I have just successfully assigned two NICs to a VM, run dhclient and
> > received proper IP addresses on both interfaces.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>