xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
To: |
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report |
From: |
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:52:46 +0800 |
Accept-language: |
zh-CN, en-US |
Acceptlanguage: |
zh-CN, en-US |
Cc: |
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:54:08 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE712556378690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<A24AE1FFE7AEC5489F83450EE98351BF2BF2EC4CB0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE712556378690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
Acu6GEBstpnTfIH/TdeQZvf0FjUZ0QAOlF+wAI5FPEAAJDXLMA== |
Thread-topic: |
Xen 4.1 rc1 test report |
Wei, Gang wrote on 2011-01-25:
>> 2. [VT-d]xen panic on function do_IRQ after many times NIC pass-throu
>> (Intel)
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1706
> There are three points we may need to do:
> 1. Figure out the root cause why the pciback could not locate the device.
> I suspect the previous 'xl destroy' didn't return the device to
> pcistub successfully.
>
> 2. Figure out the root cause why the guest pirq was not force unbound.
> Just found:
> Some time because if ( !IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) ) hit, so
> returned with -EINVAL; Sometime if ( !(desc->status & IRQ_GUEST) )
> hit, so do not unbind.
>
> 3. Think about how we could prevent such cases from panic Xen.
Just found sometime while doing domain_destroy the current->domain is IDLE
domain, so the if ( !IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) ) hit and skip the pirq
forcible unbinding. How could it happen?
Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report,
Wei, Gang <=
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Keir Fraser
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report, Wei, Gang
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix bug1706, Wei, Gang
|
|
|