|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: Reducing I/O introduced domain scheduling
Just wondering... does Xen/can Xen take VM exits on fences? If not then I don't
see you could safely buffer MMIO writes.
Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dong, Eddie
> Sent: 12 October 2010 02:12
> To: Keir Fraser
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dong, Eddie; Zhang, Xiantao
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Reducing I/O introduced domain scheduling
>
> Keir:
> When running vConsolidation on top of Xen in a 4-core
> platform, we noticed the I/O introduced scheduling per CPU is ~3K
> Hz, which seems to be too frequent and cause frequent involve of
> domain 0 / Qemu, which may polute cache of the guest and thus
> increase CPI (cycle per instruction).
>
> We are thinking if we can reduce the domin switch here, and
> think the output of I/O can be buffered and return immediately. The
> buffered I/O can be flushed out at next IN emulation (or any
> Hypervisor emulated I/O) or timeout such as 10 or 100 us to
> guarantee minimal response.
>
> Ideally it can cover both PIO & MMIO, but we can start from
> PIO.
>
> How do you think of that?
>
> Thx, Eddie
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|