WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9]

from [Tian, Kevin] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9]
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:46:47 +0800
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:47:54 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <475DE985.9040603@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20071210152025.GF12703@xxxxxxxxxx><1197306414.12267.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <475DDB9A.30300@xxxxxxxx> <D470B4E54465E3469E2ABBC5AFAC390F024D8D10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <475DE985.9040603@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acg7lofU1A8YvfFlROO7hZYs6Nrn/QAAQkwA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9] 
>From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [mailto:jeremy@xxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2007年12月11日 9:36
>
>Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> Or take a neutral one like CONFIG_XEN_PRIV?
>
>Why is that an improvement? I could see a finer grain config to do
>driver domains, perhaps, but it doesn't seem worthwhile at this point.
>But it might be useful to have some marker of which code is necessary
>for Dom0 functionality, and which is core Xen support.
>
>J
>

En.. yes, finer grain config is better.

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9], Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Next by Date:  RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH] unshadow the page table page which areusedas data page, Tian, Kevin
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9], Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9], Stephen C. Tweedie
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy