WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9]

To: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9]
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:55:00 +0000
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:55:44 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200712102138.50396.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20071210152025.GF12703@xxxxxxxxxx> <200712102138.50396.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 09:38:49PM +0000, Mark Williamson wrote:
> > In the spirit of improving communication of Fedora Xen plans to the world,
> > below is a mail I recently circulated in the Fedora community about the
> > direction for Xen-ified kernels from Fedora 9 and onwards.
> >
> > The short story, is that we intend to ship hypervisor & userspace based on
> > Xen 3.2.0 tree, and a kernel based on latest LKML pv_ops tree and patches
> > ontop of that to support Dom0 and x86_64. With some short term pain and
> > instability, we hope to get significant long term benefits for support of
> > Xen Linux kernels.
> 
> Sounds like the best possible and longterm-sustainable plan and good for 
> everybody involved.
> 
> Question: do the dom0-compatibility patches have any chance of getting into 
> kernel.org?  Or would they continue to live as a patchset?

That's a huge open ended question & you can't take anything for granted when
its comes to LKML review / feedback. I'd like to think they have a reasonable
chance, but its all depends how intrusive the changes become. Even if they
don't get accepted upstream, at least they'll be reconciled against current
accepted  DomU patches. So at worst, we have an incremental improvement in
the maintainability, at best a dramatic improvement.

Regards,
Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel