|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable.
On 25/1/07 13:16, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> bisected that one, changeset 13522 is the culpit which breaks booting
> 32pae guests on 64bit xen (and dom0).
>
> Ideas anyone?
The hook added to set_info_guest() to call vcpu_reset() is probably the most
likely culprit. However this code is churned some more by c/s 13594 which is
currently sitting in our staging tree (the Linux upgrade has caused some of
our regression tests to start failing). If necessary we'll do a manual push
to the public tree later today.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable.,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- [Xen-devel] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Liang Yang
- [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Petersson, Mats
|
|
|
|
|