|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "protocol", "%s",
>> + XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto error_xenbus;
>
> This identifies the ABI, but how does it provide versioning?
#define XEN_IO_PROTO_FB_GRANT_TABLES "fb-grant-tables" ?
Just create a descriptive name you like. Assuming we don't create
abi-dependent structs *again* when we change the protocol.
We can of course also just use XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE "-v2". With the
protocol identifier being a string there lots of ways ...
cheers,
Gerd
--
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue,
Gerd Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- [Xen-devel] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Liang Yang
- [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Petersson, Mats
- [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Liang Yang
- [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Petersson, Mats
|
|
|
|
|