|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
> The pvfb backend has a stupid tyops (missing underscore) which breaks
> the combination 32bit dom0 and 64bit domU. Fix attached. The patch
> also adds a cast to fix a warning.
>
> please apply,
>
> Gerd
>
> --
> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
> Index: build-32-release304-13133/tools/xenfb/xenfb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- build-32-release304-13133.orig/tools/xenfb/xenfb.c
> +++ build-32-release304-13133/tools/xenfb/xenfb.c
[...]
> @@ -560,10 +560,10 @@ int xenfb_attach_dom(struct xenfb *xenfb
> if (xenfb_wait_for_frontend_initialised(&xenfb->kbd) < 0)
> goto error;
>
> - if (xenfb_bind(&xenfb->fb) < 0)
> - goto error;
> if (xenfb_bind(&xenfb->kbd) < 0)
> goto error;
> + if (xenfb_bind(&xenfb->fb) < 0)
> + goto error;
>
> if (xenfb_xs_scanf1(xsh, xenfb->fb.otherend, "feature-update",
> "%d", &val) < 0)
Why is this patch hunk necessary?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue,
Markus Armbruster <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
|
|
|
|
|