|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 18:31 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> This is even better than with blkfront/blkback because there are definitely
>> no PV-on-HVM pvfb driver frontends out in the wild (and it's HVM that makes
>> things harder).
>
> PV on HVM for fbfront is pretty hard since the kernel.org tree does not
> export zap_page_range to modules, neither do many of the older distro
> kernels I've looked at.
>
> I tried doing a compat version like with other such functions but it
> ended up pulling half of mm/memory.c into the compat layer which I don't
> like.
>
> Do I vaguely recall plans to get rid of the use of zap_page_range or is
> my memory playing tricks?
>
> Ian.
We'd like to replace zap_page_range() with unmap_mapping_range(), for
several good reasons:
* it is already fully exported,
* it deals with locking automatically via the address_space
i_mmap_lock spinlock,
* it automatically iterates over all the vmas on the address_space
without us having to loop over them ourselves.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue,
Markus Armbruster <=
- [Xen-devel] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Liang Yang
- [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Petersson, Mats
- [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Liang Yang
- [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-users] Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM?, Petersson, Mats
|
|
|
|
|