|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Hi,
>> @@ -560,10 +560,10 @@ int xenfb_attach_dom(struct xenfb *xenfb
>> if (xenfb_wait_for_frontend_initialised(&xenfb->kbd) < 0)
>> goto error;
>>
>> - if (xenfb_bind(&xenfb->fb) < 0)
>> - goto error;
>> if (xenfb_bind(&xenfb->kbd) < 0)
>> goto error;
>> + if (xenfb_bind(&xenfb->fb) < 0)
>> + goto error;
>>
>> if (xenfb_xs_scanf1(xsh, xenfb->fb.otherend, "feature-update",
>> "%d", &val) < 0)
>
> Why is this patch hunk necessary?
Oh, forgot to mention that, sorry. Only vfb has a "protocol" node, vkbd
hasn't. So binding fb last makes sure we have the protocol filled
correctly in the struct.
cheers,
Gerd
--
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [Patch] [VTPM_TOOLS] Add HVM support to vtpm_manager, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue,
Gerd Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64 broken in unstable., Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Markus Armbruster
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann
|
|
|
|
|