|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code
 
| 
To:  | 
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:09:54 +0900 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Kazuo Moriwaka <moriwaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx,	Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Damm <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:26:56 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<C15B92BD.2B41%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<20061018005637.GB11422@xxxxxxxxxxxx>	<C15B92BD.2B41%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Debian) | 
 
 
 
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:13:49AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 18/10/06 1:56 am, "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> I'll check this in, so please just get rid of the if(xchg()) hacky
> >> workaround.
> > 
> > I have to say that I entirely disagree with your solution.
> > I think the solution is to get rid of -Werror. But I will
> > remove the if(xchg()) foo as you request.
> 
> Holy crap! Getting rid of Werror makes Wall much less useful. We're too lazy
> to scan build output for warnings if they don't break the build.
> 
> The GCC developers have basically broken the unused-value checking, at least
> for Linux-style code which is heavy on macro usage. If a particular warning
> option is no longer useful, the correct answer is to switch it off.
I'm quite happy with that argument. However I personally prefer
a severity differenation between warnings and errors, that is all.
-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, (continued)
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Adam Heath
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code,
Horms <=
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
 
 
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/04] Kexec / Kdump: Code shared between x86_32	and x86_64, Magnus Damm
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/04] Kexec / Kdump: x86_32 specific code, Magnus Damm
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/04] Kexec / Kdump: x86_64 specific code, Magnus Damm
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |