|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code
To: |
Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code |
From: |
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:56:37 +0100 |
Cc: |
Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kazuo Moriwaka <moriwaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Damm <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:08:06 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20061017012519.GH29719@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcbxuWOqofs9il2sEduTVgANk04WTA== |
Thread-topic: |
[PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
On 17/10/06 2:25 am, "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> TYPE_DEFAULT is kexec, TYPE_CRASH is kdump.
>
> Its just to avoid a from_guest. If you think that isn't worthwhile
> we can fold it into the structural parameter.
Yes please. This isn't performance critical. Folding will make the interface
better match other hypercalls.
> I certainly saw the problem. I'll do some more investigations.
>
> ... Actually now that I think about it for a moment, perhaps it was
> inheriting -Wall from CFLAGS in my environment. If that is the case,
> then I think the work-around I added is valid.:wq
Xen is always built with -Wall. I simply don't believe this can be a valid
warning message. There's nothing special about __xchg() that should cause
complaint when its return value is discarded (a common thing to do in C).
Can you repro the problem on vanilla versions of gcc (straight from
gnu.org)?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Adam Heath
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/04] Kexec / Kdump: Code shared between x86_32 and x86_64, Magnus Damm
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/04] Kexec / Kdump: x86_32 specific code, Magnus Damm
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/04] Kexec / Kdump: x86_64 specific code, Magnus Damm
|
|
|
|
|