|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code
To: |
Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code |
From: |
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:13:49 +0100 |
Cc: |
Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kazuo Moriwaka <moriwaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx, Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Damm <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:25:19 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20061018005637.GB11422@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcbyhPUyM94u/F54EdupPAANk04WTA== |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
On 18/10/06 1:56 am, "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'll check this in, so please just get rid of the if(xchg()) hacky
>> workaround.
>
> I have to say that I entirely disagree with your solution.
> I think the solution is to get rid of -Werror. But I will
> remove the if(xchg()) foo as you request.
Holy crap! Getting rid of Werror makes Wall much less useful. We're too lazy
to scan build output for warnings if they don't break the build.
The GCC developers have basically broken the unused-value checking, at least
for Linux-style code which is heavy on macro usage. If a particular warning
option is no longer useful, the correct answer is to switch it off.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/04] Kexec / Kdump: Release 20061016 (xen-unstable-11760), Magnus Damm
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Adam Heath
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/04] Kexec / Kdump: Generic code, Horms
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/04] Kexec / Kdump: Code shared between x86_32 and x86_64, Magnus Damm
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/04] Kexec / Kdump: x86_32 specific code, Magnus Damm
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/04] Kexec / Kdump: x86_64 specific code, Magnus Damm
|
|
|
|
|