|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper
 
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/07/09 09:35, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >   
> >> On 10/05/09 20:30, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >>     
> >>> The original version saves ecx, but not edx. Both are official
> >>> caller-saved registers.
> >>>       
> >> Hm.  It doesn't save edx because that can be half of a 64-bit return
> >> value, and in general both eax and edx are marked clobbered.
> >>     
> > Then it will be also wrong for functions returning void. They may
> > clobber eax but never set it to something correct.
> >   
> 
> The asm is marked as clobbering eax/edx, so the compiler knows it can't
> rely on them being preserved.  void functions are not expected to
> preserve them either, so it all works out (or if they are, the compiler
> will do the right thing).
> 
> Or did you have something else in mind?
> 
> 
> >>                                                               Except one
> >> place; does the patch below help?
> >>     
> > Don't you need to remove the complete wrapper setup to get a correct
> > result? (And type safety.)
> >   
> 
> Which wrapper?  Do you mean the callee-save function stuff?  Or
> something else?
> 
> It compiles cleanly for me and appears to work.  Does it solve the
> problem for you?
> 
> >>> Well, my call stack say something different. It crashs during early
> >>> startup without a console. The modifications to the function pointers is
> >>> done much later.
> >>>       
> >> You're right.  But you're holding out on me; can I see your backtrace? 
> >>     
> > Well, I'm traveling and it needs some time to recreate a broken kernel.
> >
> >   
> >> And the disassembly of the troublesome code (both the Xen function and
> >> the calling function)?
> >>     
> > That is easy.
> >   
> 
> OK, I see, thanks.
ping - any update about this fix? Since it fixes a real crash it would 
be nice to fix this for .32.
        Ingo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper, Bastian Blank
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper, Bastian Blank
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Bastian Blank
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Bastian Blank
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Bastian Blank
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper,
Ingo Molnar <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Bastian Blank
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
  
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq	helper, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] [tip:x86/urgent] x86/paravirt: Use normal calling	sequences for irq enable/disable, tip-bot for Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
  
  
 
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fbdev frontend needs xenbus frontend, Bastian Blank
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |