WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper
From: Bastian Blank <bastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:30:50 +0200
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stable Kernel <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:30:43 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4ACA90F2.1060909@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Bastian Blank <bastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stable Kernel <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20091004183013.GA26101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC92A65.40806@xxxxxxxx> <20091005013517.GA6081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ACA2AFD.4080305@xxxxxxxx> <20091005224310.GA32144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ACA90F2.1060909@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:36:02PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/05/09 15:43, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:21:01AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >>> Save all caller-saved registers on x86_32 for the paravirt callee saved
> >>> registers.
> >> That looks better, but it is still overkill.  We only need to save the
> >> set of registers the ABI requires the callee to preserve.  What
> >> additional register(s) gets clobbered by stack-protector that need to be
> >> saved?
> > Well, exactly the two, ecx and edx. eax is still clobbered by the return
> > value. Anyway, it works in praxis.
> I'm confused.  It already saves ecx, so what else needs saving?

The original version saves ecx, but not edx. Both are official
caller-saved registers.

> Besides, most of the code in that file isn't used unless you're using a
> very old version of Xen; it will generally prefer to use the ones in
> xen-asm_X.S.

Well, my call stack say something different. It crashs during early
startup without a console. The modifications to the function pointers is
done much later.

Bastian

-- 
Vulcans never bluff.
                -- Spock, "The Doomsday Machine", stardate 4202.1

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>