|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP
> On 29/12/2008 08:20, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> >> 3. Run Citrix drivers which patch Windows to avoid TPR writes.
>
> > Can you elaborate on that last point? Does that pass WHQL?
>
> The WHQL tests are oblivious to it. It's just a patching of mmio
writes to
> the APIC TPR register.
>
Looking at the way KVM does it, it appears to detect writes to the TPR
register when they are trapped, and then give the DomU (or whatever KVM
calls it) the address of the instruction so that the DomU driver can
then patch it. Is that what Citrix is doing? Does the current xensource
tree have such a mechanism in it?
Thanks
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Randy McAnally
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Dirk Utterback
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Dirk Utterback
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP,
James Harper <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Wei Huang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Tian, Kevin
|
|
|
|
|