|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP
> On 29/12/2008 09:40, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> > Assuming the hypervisor route, if I understand correctly it could go
> > like this:
>
> Either of your described approaches could work. This doesn't involve
qemu
> at
> all, since APIC emulation is done within Xen. So it'll be a new hvm_op
> hypercall either way. Getting Xen to do the patching isn't a bad idea.
> Might
> also be worth looking at how KVM does it to get some further ideas.
>
Oh. I had a quick look at hw/apic.c and assumed that's where the action
was... guess I'll look in xen then!
Thanks
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Dirk Utterback
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP,
James Harper <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Wei Huang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|