WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Windows SMP

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP
From: "Venefax" <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 22:01:29 -0500
Delivery-date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:02:53 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language:x-cr-hashedpuzzle:x-cr-puzzleid; bh=k3/EPyKxdbVY/heL46C8NyBw2GdVgIGsR4MmqXb6+9E=; b=AxovJ2rWgT7tMf6UM2RDVbqeknDEb1LhnTFVOxL3JKP7RNFuRbXlsGJizDQwoZ9btm 312lSuZnD2Oo9LOKT80dOxL6DXKpS1M/LJBMj802ZykrOkrhiEWlpV3ql9mJ97d0+QfT BRCOvqSmlImCgPjEGiCUOEtxK2EnPgvgJcZP0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language:x-cr-hashedpuzzle:x-cr-puzzleid; b=lvZHuIaQb8BrlpaZaDlnJeyA70ayKlNKxsm13ywN7n/ayRpQEy/bh1x7Mfv2/FtWkf qCSSjsNnsQEF+TfSCIdVN177oZfXz+tnL2z8bEEEGzwklTrACS8xdQgbBRuiQuLx0Rzk 1BkCbpaaPFOh2SfcC+o4BpOLWM0A4OpxDJw30=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclomJHRZPQAxvWTTHS1LTFPOLU6fA==

I think that we need to tackle the absurd loss of performance that any Windows HVM incurs with more than one processor. I have measured it and it is amazing. I have an application that opens 15 independent network clients, and with one single processor and the Standard PC Hal, it takes a little over a minute to load the 15 clients and also to register with the SIP provider. If I leave that unchanged, I mean “ceteris paribus” , and only change the HAL to ACPI and add 8 processors, then the same operation takes over 10 minutes. Hello!!! I am using the GPLVL drivers from James Harper. Right now I am about to test the MPS –Non-ACPI HAL, but the driver still create a BSOD. Maybe the problem is only ACPI, and not MPS, who knows. In any case, what can we do so any Windows virtual machine can achieve a “normal” performance, I mean, a linear performance when using more processors and not this declining curve that can kill any host.

Federico

 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>