|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP
I had to disable both, and PAE. Only APIC=0 would not make any difference. I
will some further testing with Citrix Xenserver 5, using the same virtual
machine and another copy with their vmpd drivers. I bet that there is no
difference in performance. It seems to be a Xen architectural issue. Any
ideas?
-----Original Message-----
From: James Harper [mailto:james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 9:53 PM
To: Venefax; Dirk Utterback
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP
>
> The problem is not SMP, is ACPI. I installed a non-ACPI Hal, but SMP
> capable, and the performance went right up with 4 virtual processors.
>
> I hope the developers can look into this mess.
>
Can you have ACPI enabled but APIC disabled, or is that not a valid
configuration?
Or the other way around, can you have ACPI disabled but APIC enabled?
Maybe the APIC emulation is causing a performance loss?
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Randy McAnally
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Dirk Utterback
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP,
Venefax <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Dirk Utterback
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|