xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP
To: |
'James Harper' <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Huang <wei.huang2@xxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP |
From: |
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:31:08 +0800 |
Accept-language: |
en-US |
Acceptlanguage: |
en-US |
Cc: |
Dirk, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Utterback <dirk.utterback@xxxxxxxxx>, Venefax <venefax@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:32:20 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550148@trantor> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<495A5332.1020204@xxxxxxx> <C5805010.20A14%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550148@trantor> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AclqzVmMSPSrJKoOjkW3kVbHoGxRxwAUqL0AAABM0MA= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] Windows SMP |
>From: James Harper
>Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 4:22 PM
>> > James,
>> >
>> > Travis Betak released a Windows driver which patches Windows TPR
>> > accesses. You can find it from
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/amdvopt/.
>> > The code would be useful as a reference. src link:
>> >
>> > svn co https://amdvopt.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/amdvopt
>amdvopt>
>>
>> That looks like it could be a nice drop-in piece of code!
>>
>
>He is taking a table-based approach, which would require ongoing
>maintenance. I was hoping to develop a more dynamic version, but given
>that someone else has already put the patch tables together, doing it
>dynamically suddenly seems like a lot of work :)
>
>Is there a similar approach that would work on an Intel system?
On Intel CPU with FlexPriority support, you don't need patching
guest since TPR accesses would be recognized by hardware
for acceleration automatically.
But on CPUs without h/w acceleration support, you may expect
borrow that overall idea, but instead of patching with LOCK MOV
CR0, you would replace it with a piece of code lines to emulate
similar acceleration as what h/w is assumed to do.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Wei Huang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP,
Tian, Kevin <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Andrew Lyon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP, Keir Fraser
|
|
|