WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749
From: "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 20:21:48 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc:
Delivery-date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:25:20 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C5601D85.1FF03%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <76780B19A496DC4B80439008DAD7076C01C4AE97FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C5601D85.1FF03%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclXmBNao0r28wXgSu+COUT1dxrcLAABFXwUAAAqXLA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 06/12/2008 11:45, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This is our weekly test report for Xen-unstable tree. Two new issues
>> were found; P1 bug #1393 should be always there, and was just
>> exposed by a new test case. 
>> 
>> New Bugs:
>> =====================================================================
>> 1. SMP 64bit Solaris10u5 causes Xen crash.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1393
>> 2. cpu idle time / cpufreq residency becomes extremely large.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1394
> 
> There's a good chance that at least bug #1 is fixed on current tip
> (c/s 18881).
> 

OK, we will check it with c/s 18881, thanks.



-haicheng
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel