|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749
On 07/12/2008 02:23, "Li, Xin" <xin.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> There's a good chance that at least bug #1 is fixed on current tip
>>> (c/s 18881).
>>
>> OK, we will check it with c/s 18881, thanks.
>
> The root cause of the crash when booting a 64bit Solaris 10u5 guest is that
> Xen hypervisor has turned off NX as guest AP has not turned on NX, but shadow
> already has NX set...
> So can't understand why c/s 18881 can fix the crash.
It's just a guess. There were shadow bug fixes between the tested c/s and
tip c/s.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Li, Haicheng
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Cui, Dexuan
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Gianluca Guida
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Gianluca Guida
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Nakajima, Jun
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Nakajima, Jun
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Weekly VMX status report. Xen: #18846 & Xen0: #749, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|