|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?
 
On 14/11/06 16:06, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Both ways should have the same effect as kernel_page_user is defined to
>> 0 for the non-compat case.
> 
> Well, thinko in there, wasn't that simple.  Went with the #ifdef, new
> version attached.
I've applied a version that is part yours, part Jan's, and part mine.
Changeset 12404:bb76a76985fe. It would be great if you could test that it
actually still works on Xen 3.0.2! :-)
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, (continued)
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?,
Keir Fraser <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Jan Beulich
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Jan Beulich
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |