|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?
>By the way, the test of whether to poke in PAGE_USER can be done by looking
>at one of the initial mappings provided by the domain builder. If one of
>those ptes contains PAGE_USER, you know you need to use PAGE_USER for all
>kernel mappings.
How would this work? adjust_guest_l1e() (and BASE_PROT for dom0) forces
PAGE_USER on even on 3.0.3, so I still shouldn't find any L1 page table entries
not having this bit set when looking at them from kernel code.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?,
Jan Beulich <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|