|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?
On 15/11/06 10:02, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I've applied a version that is part yours, part Jan's, and part mine.
>> Changeset 12404:bb76a76985fe. It would be great if you could test that it
>> actually still works on Xen 3.0.2! :-)
>
> Works for me, thanks. Maybe that should be added to the regression tests?
>
> BTW: what is the state of the testing mercurial tree? It hasn't seen
> updates for quite some time. I'd expect bugfixes like this one being
> queued for 3.0.3 too ...
We currently maintain a patch queue against 3.0.3-testing and we'll apply
patches to 3.0.3-testing from that.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_XEN_COMPAT_030002 broken?, Jan Beulich
|
|
|
|
|