WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:20:06 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1320149947; bh=vsM4W27J3D4TcCh+XK3z9NGquVUV6+1/Q3aIcjT7/0E=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EUHk4j5o6ishTligfvgFkxQxiwwwyeTVtkzi60HSmBafaxgoBifoxODGndmy3zZJ7m2iMeFWJv0uLQ/xBBPs7u8x8p8pUDQ/rfKKzBugPHGPJkiOnSMy8LwY8W9g5wMyudV9dIwNDgRo/1ZU5xT1YY2LAA/ZfudgjACfJgsm7Q0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=y3crj2qThtz38Q3bmTVyChE272C1lQW6zdx9Ym5WRpNT6Zd7kpIDKSUrzHOJ7ASy68S4sGfb6Z4YWIzee1rf949v71G2WCq9FsWCTCq9VZZn7MFuhKnlCKpNvZ5b74LgT+BqzNBUgHrj/RorEVZxdTsDYbEe0+213Qppk8E7vqY=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4EAFD891.8000204@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pasi,

Have you asked yourself a question why Fedora and Ubuntu always patch and package
Qemu-kvm-0.15(14)(13)(..).1.tar.gz , but not  Qemu-0.15(14)(13)(..).1.tar.gz ?
Just install a couple of src.rpms to take a look - what's inside.

Boris.

--- On Tue, 11/1/11, Mark Dokter <dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Mark Dokter <dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10
To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2011, 7:31 AM

On 10/31/2011 10:40 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>


Hi!

> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1110_xenkvm&num=1
>
> Ubuntu 11.10 with Xen 4.1.1 and Linux 3.0.
>

I've read the article and was surprised.

> Xen seems to be doing very poorly on that benchmark.
> If someone has time to repeat that benchmark it would be good..
>
> Comparing the results to those from Stefano from XenSummit 2011 NA there has be something wrong..
> the results at XenSummit were pretty much the opposite compared to those by Phoronix.
>

In that test, the KVM machine uses virtio disk and nic devices, while
the Xen machine uses the qemu emulated devices. Could that be the cause
for the poor performance?

> -- Pasi

Mark

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel