 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10 |
| From: | Mark Dokter <dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:31:29 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:32:23 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1320147095; i=@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bh=5Rin+ROLHjXdDV7MLWEuELMMkjJ3mw3vBg9VBGGnOS0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nsdfoHNqRTrhgl0dCS653nnsYGAb1948ChOcOSN1nRV7ijoUJG3Wjmyka9CiaW4JG bkoAaW6PO7DLcO+oHyYNUEYLTQTW+tRNaVXzJZcOrmf9OFEmccQehM3UoyTPlvtjTI tlKVTgvR28AdxdoKvnfDcNynQKEwQHPbx+oWWlaE= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20111031214036.GG12984@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision |
| References: | <20111031214036.GG12984@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111031 Thunderbird/7.0.1 |
On 10/31/2011 10:40 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Hello, > Hi! > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1110_xenkvm&num=1 > > Ubuntu 11.10 with Xen 4.1.1 and Linux 3.0. > I've read the article and was surprised. > Xen seems to be doing very poorly on that benchmark. > If someone has time to repeat that benchmark it would be good.. > > Comparing the results to those from Stefano from XenSummit 2011 NA there has > be something wrong.. > the results at XenSummit were pretty much the opposite compared to those by > Phoronix. > In that test, the KVM machine uses virtio disk and nic devices, while the Xen machine uses the qemu emulated devices. Could that be the cause for the poor performance? > -- Pasi Mark _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: allow to enable/disable cpuid bits, Christoph Egger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10, Ian Campbell |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: allow to enable/disable cpuid bits, Christoph Egger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10, Ian Campbell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
