Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup

To:	Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup
From:	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:04:23 +0100
Cc:	Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:05:38 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4C37027A.5030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Newsgroups:	chiark.mail.xen.devel
References:	<1278507656-7745-1-git-send-email-vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007071752210.21432@kaball-desktop> <4C35B3E1.2010106@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007081455060.21432@kaball-desktop> <1278598709.28432.589.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100709081755.GC31695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C36FD7A.1070303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100709105101.GD31695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C37027A.5030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Vincent Hanquez writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API 
cleanup"):
> I think that either is fine from my point of view; as long as I don't 
> have to capture two very different semantics (starting a program | 
> starting a domain) in one call.

I still disagree.  I think it would be better to hide this distinction
as much as possible.

Your key motive seems to be some problem with the ocaml bindings.
Perhaps you could explain that in more detail ?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.16: hvm domU boot - oops at add_pin_to_irq_node_nopanic, Bruce Edge

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] GSoC 2010 - Migration from memory ballooning to memory hotplug in Xen, Daniel Kiper

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup, Vincent Hanquez

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup, Stefano Stabellini

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup