WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup
From: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:14:51 +0100
Cc: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:15:49 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19511.22167.615318.444003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1278507656-7745-1-git-send-email-vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007071752210.21432@kaball-desktop> <4C35B3E1.2010106@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007081455060.21432@kaball-desktop> <1278598709.28432.589.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100709081755.GC31695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C36FD7A.1070303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100709105101.GD31695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C37027A.5030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19511.22167.615318.444003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100620 Icedove/3.0.5
On 09/07/10 18:04, Ian Jackson wrote:
Vincent Hanquez writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API 
cleanup"):
I think that either is fine from my point of view; as long as I don't
have to capture two very different semantics (starting a program |
starting a domain) in one call.

I still disagree.  I think it would be better to hide this distinction
as much as possible.

Your key motive seems to be some problem with the ocaml bindings.
Perhaps you could explain that in more detail ?

This has nothing to do with the ocaml bindings, but this has to do with who is using those bindings (i.e. a fully featured toolstack).

--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel