WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup

On 09/07/10 09:17, Tim Deegan wrote:
Is it necessary to pull the mechanism out along with the policy though?
Or, if we're taking some mechanism out, couldn't we take _all_ the
mechanism out?

Which one do you have in minds ?

The idea of a stub domain doesn't seem like one that
libxl necessarily needs to know about.
yes, indeed. the stubdom create could move as a xl helper.
On the ocaml side reimplementing stubdom create is a trivial composition of smaller libxl function (create/build/add devs) which are already bound.

--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>