Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:03 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> > On 07/07/10 17:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > I though we wanted to make stubdoms transparent to libxenlight users,
> > > why do you want to expose them now?
> > >    
> >  From the users yes, from the libxenlight users (aka developers) no.
> > It's also a good way to get the policy out of libxenlight. For example the
> > 32mb value which might or might not change in future.
>  
> Fair enough.
> I ack the whole series then.

Is it necessary to pull the mechanism out along with the policy though? 

Could the libxl user not specify one of nostubdom, stubdom or
libxlchooses (the default?) and let the internals of libxl take care of
actually starting it etc?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel