 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS
| To: | Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:31:26 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:32:20 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <491D4286.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AclGM2IboO0XXLImEd2xqwAWy6hiGQ== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 |
On 14/11/08 08:19, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is fixing this actually any harder than just bumping NR_IRQS/NR_PIRQS in Xen >> and NR_PIRQS in Linux? Have IRQS and VECTORS got somehow accidentally tied >> together in Xen? > > Perhaps not, but I only started checking (on the Xen side - the kernel side > has no issues, already bumped the value there). I'll continue as time permits. > >> These parameters should probably be build-time configurable. > > That'd certainly be nice for NR_IRQS (it seems we agreed to get rid of > NR_PIRQS). I can't the same being valid for NR_VECTORS, though. I can't really disagree regarding NR_VECTORS! -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [IA64] Weekly benchmark results [ww45], KUWAMURA Shin'ya |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03 of 38] swiotlb: allow architectures tooverride swiotlb pool allocation, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
