Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS

["Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 19.11.08 17:09 >>>
>On 19/11/08 15:55, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> Is fixing this actually any harder than just bumping NR_IRQS/NR_PIRQS in Xen
>>> and NR_PIRQS in Linux? Have IRQS and VECTORS got somehow accidentally tied
>>> together in Xen?
>> 
>> Unfortunately there was some mix-up. But I think I got this fixed (running
>> a NR_IRQS=1024 hypervisor at the moment). I'd prefer to submit these
>> patches only after your NR_PIRQS -> NR_IRQS change comes out of the
>> staging tree though, to make sure it applies (and works) correctly on top
>> of it.
>
>Okay, I manually synced the tree. I've been meaning to do so for a while.

Is there anything in particular that's broken (and thus preventing it to
progress automatically) that one should be aware of?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel