WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support

To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>, "Chris Wright" <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:45:45 +0300
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:54:01 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Ies4Rv1ibdYsAtB2N18JsPChoFLKYXFogfVCUtzK0uOrl8nNcTT14RaZVo24tr+gI0HHgH+o+Kwrp6lg+45TIbkgUJmFAKeqXfFqJgXWRkC4xVr2MV09o5O6h9NwfSGMYAgW3CMEdtJxB/1ON8Isgt+GlliiUHWPrCiXSdKRepg=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060509152240.GA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060509084945.373541000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4460AC01.5020503@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060509150701.GA14050@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73k68v4444.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060509152240.GA17837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's also wrong.  There's more than one hypervisor and Xen shouldn't just
> > grab this namespace.  make it xen_ or xenhv_.
>
> You should reject the recent "hypervisor file system" with the same
> argument then.

On 5/9/06, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I prefer it would become lparfs or something like that indeed.

AFAIK it's called s390-hypfs now.

                                     Pekka

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel