WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:22:40 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:52:44 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <p73k68v4444.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20060509084945.373541000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4460AC01.5020503@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060509150701.GA14050@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73k68v4444.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's also wrong.  There's more than one hypervisor and Xen shouldn't just
> > grab this namespace.  make it xen_ or xenhv_.
> 
> You should reject the recent "hypervisor file system" with the same
> argument then.

I prefer it would become lparfs or something like that indeed.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel