|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards 
| On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2006, at 15:13, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > Tick N:
> >     delta = 2.2
> >     stolen = 0.9
> >     blocked = 0.7
> > 
> >     stolen and blocked will not get incremented, while
> >     the per-cpu processed_time gets 2 jiffies
> 
> But we decrement delta_cpu *before* rounding down. So, after handling 
> stolen and blocked, we'll end up with delta_cpu==0.6 which gets rounded 
> down to 0 and so per-cpu processed_time gets 0 jiffies?
Hmmmm good point!
Now I no longer understand my own bugfix.  Great...
-- 
All Rights Reversed
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
[PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards,
Rik van Riel <=
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |