|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards 
| 
On 14 Mar 2006, at 15:13, Rik van Riel wrote:
 
Tick N:
        delta = 2.2
        stolen = 0.9
        blocked = 0.7
        stolen and blocked will not get incremented, while
        the per-cpu processed_time gets 2 jiffies
 
But we decrement delta_cpu *before* rounding down. So, after handling 
stolen and blocked, we'll end up with delta_cpu==0.6 which gets rounded 
down to 0 and so per-cpu processed_time gets 0 jiffies? 
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
[PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards,
Keir Fraser <=
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Rik van Riel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Time went backwards, Keir Fraser
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |