|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer
* I would create two different input devices for mouse/keyboard
(although strictly seen it isn't really needed) to avoid confusing
userspace apps.
Another strategy for input would be to use USB input devices and the
USB over IP stack (or Xen USB support) to shift the devices between
domains.
To handle remote display you need a xenconsoled-like helper application
in domain0 anyway (which for example could export the display via vnc).
That gives you remote input (via vnc or whatever protocol) almost for
free as well, and I think application-wise it is much more convinient to
take this route instead of using hid-over-virtualusb-over-ip.
Installing multiple keyboards, USB audio devices, mice and multiple
video cards is one way to achieve multiuser computing.
It's kida silly though to assign a domain some physical keyboard and a
virtual framebuffer.
It might suddenly make much more sense once we can assign pci devices to
domU's again, so you can setup a domU with both real display and
keyboard, but thats completely unrelated to the virtual framebuffer ;)
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, M.A. Williamson
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, Gerd Knorr
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, Jacob Gorm Hansen
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, Jon Smirl
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, Gerd Knorr
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, Anthony Liguori
RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, James Harper
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, Jon Smirl
RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer, Petersson, Mats
|
|
|
|
|