|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again
xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 01/20/2005
07:48:58 PM:
> Mark Williamson wrote:
> >>Also, I suppose you will wish to prevent covert channels between
> >>domains, e.g. domains communicating using various timing attacks
(I move
> >>the disk head to the other end of the disk if I wish to tell
you
> >>something), or by allocating/freeing certains parts of memory.
> >>
> >>How much will you need to dumb down the VMs view of what is
going on in
> >>the machine to achieve this (not expose real time information,
not
> >>expose real page tables), and how much of a VMM will there
be left when
> >>you are done?
> >
> > Well domains are not aware of each other's memory usage, so I
wouldn't have
> > thought that allocation / exposing real page tables would matter.
(Except
> > dom0 can of course see everything if it wants).
>
> Information about other domains' memory usage is leaked via the
> hardware->physical mapping.
There might be a problem of object-reuse
and isolation. If memory isn't cleared before
it is given to another partition, then
this is an error. If disk space isn't cleared before it is
reused by another partition, then this
seems serious, too.
Question:
a) Does the balloon driver clean pages
before releasing it to other partitions? (I guess not)
b) Does the page-swap thas happens when
a packet is received clear the pages? (I guess not)
c) If a) or b) use un-cleaned pages:
did anybody try to sniff data (passwords, keys) from another
non-cooperating
partitions out of re-used pages?
> > Timing related attacks are somewhat trickier to eliminate covert
> channels in,
> > although some randomisation can limit the bandwidth.
>
> Eliminating covert channels is completely infeasible. I don't see
any
> value in aiming for this. It's not a useful security property in most
> circumstances.
> --
> David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To eliminate ALL covert channels might
not be in our interest, but to ignore all of
them seems unnatural as well.
Certainly, covert channels are a way
to spend many discussions.
Reiner
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, (continued)
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again,
Reiner Sailer <=
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Steven Hand
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Steven Hand
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Jody Belka
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Mark A. Williamson
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Mark A. Williamson
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Jody Belka
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Mark Williamson
- Re: Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again, Jody Belka
- Re: Multiple netif device channels (was Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again), Mark Williamson
- Re: Multiple netif device channels (was Fw: [Xen-devel] Xen on /. again), Jody Belka
|
|
|
|
|