WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken

from [Adam Heath] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Brian Wolfe <brianw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken
From: Adam Heath <doogie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:58:17 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@xxxxxx>, Xen Devel Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:12:16 +0100
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1098547866.32097.250.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87is94fh2q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098418544.32097.136.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <877jpjdj6q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098538551.32097.201.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <871xfpczo9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098540624.32097.229.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87u0slbj69.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098547866.32097.250.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Brian Wolfe wrote:

> *nod* I can see your point about the bootloader issue. Maybe I can set a
> pre-install debconf question that asks where the admin wants to stuff
> em, standard location, or host server location (/usr/lib/xen or
> /usr/lib/kernels or something)

Er, bad.  If you have install-time placement of files, then dpkg -S doesn't
work right.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken, Adam Heath
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] xen Makefile being nasty with EXTRAVERSION, Adam Heath
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken, Brian Wolfe
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken, Nuutti Kotivuori
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy