|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken
> There are cases where strict separation is not an issue, where
> granting priviledges does not really matter.
>
> And even where strict separation is an issue, with Xen there shouldn't
> be any problem, should there?
No problem, it's perfectly safe in Xen for users to run whatever they please
as a kernel. If it tries to access things it shouldn't, the accesses will
safely fail. All security is enforced by Xen.
It'd be rather nice to have a Xen "bootloader" allowing users to choose a
kernel they'd compiled without help from a sysadmin. This is not technically
difficult, so it's just a question of someone putting the time in.
HTH,
Mark
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|