WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Most stable Xen distro?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Most stable Xen distro?
From: MS <ms@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:32:32 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:33:09 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47FA820E.5000903@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47F94654.1060701@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47FA696F.40001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47FA6B5A.1070009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47FA820E.5000903@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
But the 2.6.18.x dosnt support a 3Ware 9650 raid controller, and dthe official driver from 3ware are buggy.
So i use the Ubuntu Dom0 kernel 2.6.20 without any problems

Stephan Seitz schrieb:
You,re right,

the ubuntu xenified kernels can't be used for productive use. I don't know
why the ubuntu guys are porting to the 2.6.24. I might be wrong, but even
on latest server hardware, Xen's 2.6.18.8 is the best choice if want to
get rid of dom0 panics ;)

Henri Cook schrieb:
I had *very* bad Ubuntu/Xen experiences, even with Hardy Heron. As much
as i'm loathe to recommend a non-debian based dist, it appears that most
of the happy successful users, use Redhat (fedora? possibly CentOS)

I might be wrong, the Ubuntu packages ended up crashing my machine
multiple times in a day because of kernel bugs on high I/O

Henri

Doug Breshears wrote:
Is there a consensus on which distro is the best for running a Xen dom0?
I have tried Debian Etch (Xen 3.0.3/2.4.18 kernel) but it was having
problems with the domU's thinking the (virtual) hard drive was bad.
I upgraded to Xen 3.2 hypervisor and tools (Using Etch Backports) and
that helped quite a bit (errors are not fatal but still there) but
this left the kernel untouched and I assumed that it would be best to
get a kernel compiled with the same version of hypervisor you are using.

I then tried Ubuntu Gutsy (Xen 3.1/2.6.22 kernel) but the domU guests
hang while booting.

I assume, you've only checked via xm console?
You might want to add

extra='xencons=tty1'

in your domU config to get a shell.


If you want to stay with ubuntu/gutsy:

I've recently setup a small repository which contains Xen3.2.0 for gutsy/amd64
at http://boreas.netz-haut.net/

You might also want to try 2.6.18.8 (running on different boxes w/ no problems)
http://boreas.netz-haut.net/pub/kernelpack-2.6.18.8-xen.tar.gz

cheers

Stephan




I would prefer a Debian Etch dom0 but will go with whatever works best.

So to clarify.. Is there a Xen distro package / Kernel package
combination that works best?
I would consider compiling from scratch but I am not sure that would
do any better.

Any suggestions?
Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users