Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 Zombies?

[David Kowis <dkowis@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Andy Smith wrote:
> In my experience xen 3.x has lots of bugs that the developers have not
> yet found time to address, whereas xen 2.x has lots of bugs that are
> either known about and won't be fixed or are unknown and won't be
> investigated, since 2.x is effectively obsolete now.
> 
> So personally I wouldn't downgrade to 2.x except as a last resort.
> 
> Unfortunately for me the hardware I'm having most trouble with will
> not boot at all under 2.x and just memory leaks itself to death
> under 3.x, so... :)

D'oh! :(

> 
> At least using 3.x your bug reports can do some good.

Works for me :) I'm planning on putting my vms through some pretty hefty
thrashing. Should definitely test their stability. And I've no big
problems with using xen 3.0 so I'll stick with it then.

Thanks :)
- --
David Kowis

ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux

Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
  - Robert Heinlein

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
  - Arthur C. Clarke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
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=JQ1e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users