Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 Zombies?

[David Kowis <dkowis@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

James Henderson wrote:
> I'm sorry Xen project managers, but if Xen 3 isn't ready for production,
> then please draw more attention to the Xen 2.0 on the Xensource web
> page.  Or at least, on the Xen 3 downloads page, include a link for Xen
> 2 and state that *that's* what should be used in a stable environment.
> 

I'm somewhat new to Xen, so I'm curious. Xen 2.0.7 is significantly more
stable than the 3.0 version? I've only run into one problem with my
VM's: They don't shutdown cleanly when I run xm shutdown domain1 .  The
domain simply powers off. I may downgrade to xen 2.0.7 in the hopes that
stuff works better...

Another question, whats the most recent kernel that xen uses?
Is it just 2.6.12.6 (Xen 3.0)?

Thanks,
- --
David Kowis

ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
Source Mage GNU/Linux

Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
  - Robert Heinlein

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
  - Arthur C. Clarke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
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=k3Nx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users