WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:19:08 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:19:35 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Keir,

without the old IO-APIC part addressed, I wonder whether we should
really have the backport of 23805:7048810180de ("IRQ: manually EOI
migrating line interrupts") in both trees.

I'd also like you to add 23820:ba75234a6f56 ("bitmap_scnlistprintf()
should always zero-terminate its output buffer") to 4.0 (I see it's
already in 4.1), as this not being fixed confuses 'e' debug key output.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel